Private Space Plane Passes 2nd Captive Flight Te...


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Username:   Password:

Unlimited Web Hosting RSS

Recent Topics

Gallery Latest


31 Views
0 comment(s)

49 Views
0 comment(s)


357 Views
0 comment(s)

295 Views
0 comment(s)


348 Views
0 comment(s)

341 Views
0 comment(s)

Search The Gallery

User Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 24, 2020, 18:14:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length


   

DatahopaForumHeavens AboveAviationPrivate Space Plane Passes 2nd Captive Flight Test



Pages: [1]

Private Space Plane Passes 2nd Captive Flight Test

Viewing: 0 Members and 1 Guest       Total Views: 3239

Offline sybershot Topic starter
United States WWW Posts: 1635
Rank: Certified
Posted August 24, 2013, 16:23:34 PM Logged

Offline DD1975
England Posts: 1458
Rank: Certified

Good find that Syber, I didn't realise that SNC had got that far in development of the Deream CHaser.

I also came across this:

http://www.wired.com/autopia/2013/07/boeing-capsule-interior/
Posted August 24, 2013, 20:42:58 PM
Last Edit: August 24, 2013, 21:14:19 PM by DD1975
Logged
Smoke me a Kipper I'll be back for breakfast - Ace Rimmer

Offline Snowcrash
England Global Moderator
Posts: 2159
Rank: Certified

Both interesting articles.

Syber. I like the way they're harking back to the ideas in the X-24A (HL-10 from the 6 million dollar man) and X-38. Make sense to just send crew without payload as payloads are much cheaper to send on a rocket.

DD. But what does it look like? Found this, very Apollo capsule looking.
Posted August 25, 2013, 10:56:36 AM Logged
“I cannot remember the books I've read any more than the meals I have eaten; even so, they have made me.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Offline sybershot Topic starter
United States WWW Posts: 1635
Rank: Certified

Quote
Good find that Syber, I didn't realise that SNC had got that far in development of the Deream CHaser.
Neither did I until I came across the article. However there are seems that there are no engines installed as one can see from the second photo within the photo gallery.

Quote
Syber. I like the way they're harking back to the ideas in the X-24A
Same here  thumbsup thumbsup
Quote
Make sense to just send crew without payload as payloads are much cheaper to send on a rocket.
the Dream Chaser will have a payload capacity of 7 people  Tongue  LOL only joking around with ya, I agree with you 100%  Wink
Posted August 25, 2013, 17:21:50 PM Logged

Offline DD1975
England Posts: 1458
Rank: Certified

Quote
the Dream Chaser will have a payload capacity of 7 people  Tongue  LOL only joking around with ya, I agree with you 100%  Wink

So will Dragon, and that is on a rocket  Wink
Posted August 26, 2013, 17:54:11 PM
Last Edit: August 27, 2013, 18:19:26 PM by Snowcrash
Logged
Smoke me a Kipper I'll be back for breakfast - Ace Rimmer

Offline sybershot Topic starter
United States WWW Posts: 1635
Rank: Certified

Rockets are so cool Cheesy
Posted August 26, 2013, 19:49:58 PM Logged

Offline DaveMorton
United States WWW Global Moderator
Posts: 3413
Rank: Certified
Comfort the Disturbed! Disturb the Comfortable!

The thing about rockets though is that if they're having to lift "delicate cargo" (e.g. squishy humans, or other things that can't withstand higher G forces), they don't work as efficiently as they could otherwise. Granted the drop in efficiency isn't much, but it's there, and it's significant over time.
Posted August 26, 2013, 20:46:00 PM Logged
Safe, Reliable Insanity, Since 1961!
Chat With Morti!
Linkedin
Space Attack!
Aviation
Topic Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Site Activity
Most Online Today: 152
127 Guests, 3 Users
Freddy, Data, DataBot