I thought perpetual motion was a pipe dream, at least that's what we are told, you can't get something for nothing.

Reading through the 14 pages it seems that modern technology is about to turn that theory on its head, I wonder can it be true, we all want it to be but really can it?

It seems it could be:

There isn't much information on the actual technology behind it.

I will hold fire on reserving judgment just yet and wish them the best of luck.

Excellent find DD 

You know, the statement that he spent "thirty-five thousand hours of science" sounds impressive, till you do the math. That's just shy of 4 years, so not really all that long, considering all of the other "perpetual motion", "free energy" (which amounts to nearly the same thing), or other (I want to say "crackpot" here) projects of this nature that have been researched and worked on for far longer periods.

And what's with the fashion disaster? Does it HAVE to look like someone played "mad doctor" with a lemon and a UFO? I mean, yellow is a nice enough colour, but it looks like E.T. is trying to mate with a Smart Car!

Well, with regard to AI, we'll never see it until we can get at least 2 people to agree on what "intelligence" actually is.

Itelligence ?, Hmmm. Is that when someone does something in good faith and another person takes offence. 

To me, "intelligence" is being able to open a can of soup without a can opener. AND without destroying the can, or making a mess. Well, without TOO much of a mess, at least.

Now you mention it, it does put more doubt in my mind.

Snowy will put us straight 

Surely a submarine should be yellow.

And as for perpetual motion. 2lot, it's the law. (2nd law of thrmodynamics, the reason perpetual motion can't work)